Guest Blog Posts

In Defense of Rhyme —— guest blog post by Kathy Lundy Derengowski

 

At a time when rhyming poets and free verse poets are like armed camps, perhaps it is time for us to find a middle ground, a time for truces and treaties, mutual respect and support for colleagues who have common interests and face common challenges, because in spite of a thriving poetry community, print publications, an online presence and innumerable blogs, by and large poets and poetry are currently out of fashion. Someone has suggested that if you don’t believe this, you should ask your (non-poet) friends to name five living poets. For the most part they will be stumped. They would have no problem naming politicians, sports stars, entertainers and all manner of celebrities—but poets?

kathyquoteThere was a time when this was not the case. According to Nancy Milford’s biography of Edna St. Vincent Millay, in 1938 she was the 10th most famous person in the United States. Her colorful lifestyle was certainly a part of that, but so was her poetry, and for the most part it was rhyming poetry. There was a time when poets were well-known and respected, when people routinely read and memorized poetry, when it was taught in schools and strong and lovely lines were routinely quoted. In reality it was a golden age of poetry. Broaden your research and ask your friends to name 5 poets, living OR dead, and if they can, odds are that more than half of them will be rhyming poets, not exclusively rhyming, and yet…Take this a step farther and ask them to name five poems. The overwhelming answers will be poems that rhyme. They won’t be jingles, or Hallmark grade, saccharine or silly. The reasons are simple. The human brain is hard-wired to respond to rhythm and repetition and is programmed to remember based on sound, similarities and predictability.

We don’t routinely think of song lyrics when we speak of poets and poetry, but the Nobel committee put the lie to that by naming Dylan as the winner of this year’s Nobel prize in literature. No sooner was that announced than Twitter and the internet lit up with anger and dismissive rant. He was “not a poet, but a song-writer.” Worse still, he was a rhymer! (The ancient tradition of the Bard was ignored and disrespected.) But historically, as free verse came into vogue it became common to denigrate and trivialize rhyme. It was unnecessary. They are two sides of the same coin.

This isn’t an essay to stoke the fires of war between the proponents of free verse and rhyme. I love both, I write both, but I think that by belittling rhyme and marginalizing it we are doing ourselves a disservice. Rhyme is another hoop to jump through. Done well, it will draw you in, lodge in your memory, sing in your heart. Done poorly? Well, it is painful to read and hard on the ears. It demands timing, cohesion, discernment and a sophisticated vocabulary—the exact same qualities that characterize excellent free verse. The antagonism between rhymers and non-rhymers is not only unnecessary, but is also divisive to the poetry community in general. I believe that rhyme is an important tool in a poet’s skill set but it is also important to acknowledge that it is a hard and demanding task master—all the more reason that we should grant it the honor and respect that it deserves.

Because something is well-loved does not imply that it is inelegant, and popular is not a synonym for inferior. Rhyme schemes may be clever, complex or discrete. Rhyme encompasses sonnets and elegies, limericks and ditties, odes and anthems. But the form, or formality are not what determine the quality of the poem. I am merely asking for, begging for, a new, or perhaps renewed, respect for the traditions of rhyme, an acknowledgement of both the inspiration and skill that goes into the rhyming poem. As in so many other areas of our lives, in art, we do not elevate our own choices by demeaning someone else’s. We are entitled to our preferences (indeed, where would we be without them?) What we love reflects our own passions. But it is the recognition of the tastes and aesthetics of others that serves the poetic community at its finest—in this case, the special and revered tradition of rhyme. Too often free verse poets are disparaging of rhyme, calling it simplistic, juvenile or sing-song. Rhyming poets are not entirely innocent either, as they are apt to dismiss free verse as obscure, fraudulent or elitist. But as our mothers told us, two wrongs do not make a right. The reality is, if you are a poet, then we are compatriots in the country of poetry, no more enemies than the oil painter and the water colorist or the concert violinist and the jazz pianist. The field of poetry is enhanced by every writer with a gift, a muse, an inspiration. To some, it will come in free verse, others, blank verse, or haiku. And sometimes if we are very fortunate, it will create a rhyming cadence all its own.


Do you have something say about poetry? An essay on being a poet, tips for poets, or poetry you love? TrishHopkinson.com is now accepting pitches for guest blog posts. 

Contact me here if you are interested! 


img_1193

Kathy Lundy Derengowski is a native of San Diego county. She is an active member and co-facilitator of the Lake San Marcos Writer’s Workshop. Her work has appeared in Summation, the ekphraisis anthology of the Escondido Arts Partnership, California Quarterly, Silver Birch Press, Turtle Light Press and the Journal of Modern Poetry. She has won awards from the California State Poetry Society and been a finalist in the San Diego book Awards poetry chapbook category.

22 replies »

  1. ‘…ask your (non-poet) friends to name five living poets.’

    No surprise at all there. There is very little memorable (remember-able) poetry being produced and then supported by publication. The publications that include a poem and get delivered into households (broadsheet newspapers, for example) choose the esoteric over the accessible. Who would want to read it for pleasure on a Saturday morning? Who could remember it the next afternoon? Why would one bother.

    I contend that the rhymers that are remembered were story-tellers and communicators first and foremost. Rhyme was a means to remember. There are some good practitioners around, but mostly they are writing songs.

    Rant over.

    Cheers and thanks for the provocation,

    Frank

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Great article. As a rhythm and rhyme poet myself it is great to hear an encouraging word about my side of the poetry coin. I find it hard to find publishers, magazines or otherwise, that are willing to utilize rhyming poetry. I can only hope that the worm is turning.

    Mike Dailey

    On Sun, Jan 8, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Trish Hopkinson wrote:

    > tlhopkinson posted: ” At a time when rhyming poets and free verse poets > are like armed camps, perhaps it is time for us to find a middle ground, a > time for truces and treaties, mutual respect and support for colleagues who > have common interests and face common challe” >

    Liked by 2 people

  3. I am a rhymer… I personally enjoy various types of poetry, but have to admit to suffering from some elitist snobbishness because I dare to rhyme. I think part of the problem is that there is so much badly done rhyming verse out there, and for many “non-poets” their idea of poetry equates to “something (anything) that rhymes”. I live in the UK, and if you stopped the average person in the street and asked them to write a poem, the chances are that it would start “roses are red…”

    I am a passionate advocate for the power of simple communication. There is an art to this that belies its simplicity. It does not rely on rhyme, but often uses rhythm. If your poetry is rhythm-less, and uses language to distance itself from my own vocabulary or view of the world, then I am unlikely to connect.

    Here’s to finding the right words, whatever form they take 🙂

    Like

  4. As a convicted ‘rhymester’ often guilty of the opposite prejudice – it took me many years (and the work of Robert Browning) to accept that a poem that did NOT rhyme could be worthy of the name – I thank you for this reminder that ‘the country of poetry’ is motherland to us all, whatever our creative tastes and choices.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Why not simplify it? If you like it (the poem) you like it; if not, you don’t. Regardless of how it’s written.
    While I prefer things that never start each and every first line with a capital letter, and skim something, if it’s a rhymed deal, I tend to pass… both have their merits and often for different reasons. A syrupy religious poem, or a limerick, have their place… so do raw love poems, or descriptions of death. But the major agony, speaking of who remembers whom — with the absolute tons of people who write poetry today, and jam the literary journals full of what most will “never” be remembered in two weeks time, much less two months, nor two years, or two decades… we have a problem. Neither the poem nor the poet comes to mind!! What makes them unique, special, long lasting? Figure that out, and you have a winner.

    BUT, it really gets under my skin, and a great reason why most people avoid it ALL: poets these days seem to write more for the library than they do for people. So why should anyone be “touched,” or care? Not that personal emoting from the ghetto should be a standard — it’s the personal, human emoting, with a universal element to it, that makes it mean something, other than describing daffodils in a vase, or
    going on and on, with one needing two degrees in alien biology to understand what the hell the “—” was trying to say.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thank you for adding your perspective! I love the variety and accessibility of today’s poetry community and I do believe some of it will be remembered and some day added to the “cannon,” just as it has been in the past.

      Like

  6. The row between rhymed poetry and the one not rhymed makes no sense. Poetry is poetry and poets are compatriots in the world of poetry. However, the difference is due to art form. If emotion is the basic content, poetry has to flow in language making sound or without it, but keeping pace and rhythm. The element of thought mostly illumines and determines the form.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s